Tuesday, November 26, 2013

Uh oh.


Religious Freedom Restoration Act, eh?

Per the story,

RFRA, as it's referred to, says law that burden religious liberties must have a compelling government interest and be narrowly tailored to meet that interest.

The law looks like an unconstitutional effort by statute to add a clause to the constitution. 

And a damned silly bow toward establishment with no warrant in the enumerated powers conservatives so hypocritically yell about when it serves their turn. 

1 comment:

  1. See, this is fantastic Philo for if your employer is a Christian "Scientist" and does not believe in blood transfusions and antibiotics he can demand that an healthcare coverage he provides doesn't cover those abominations.

    ReplyDelete