This Is a War
Some are saying I provoked this attack.
But to kowtow to violent intimidation will only encourage more of it.
A non-denial, that was.
Put aside her hyper-Zionism and warmongering.
She is not asserting them here, and anyway those two guys did not go to Garland about those things.
They went about the cartoon images of Mohammed.
They went to punish people drawing or making public or viewing such cartoons with murder.
Many Muslim regimes have joined with the Muslim masses and Muslim terrorists in telling all of the peoples and nations of the whole world, "You are forbidden to make cartoons of Mohammed."
"And if you do that," the terrorists say, with the support of the masses and to the satisfaction of many of those regimes, "we will kill you."
Anyone who complies is surrendering to terrorism.
Anyone who does not comply risks a terrorist attack.
If you are going to do what the terrorists forbid, why not do it as an act of defiance?
If you are going to do it as an act of defiance, why not do it as a provocation, for educational effect?
It is an illusion that we can permit disobedience while forbidding provocation.
Either we submit to the demands of these Muslims or we don't.
She says we don't.
I personally am pleased with that.
If you cannot exercise your freedom in safety, how free are you?
How free are we, who cannot afford a full time squad of bodyguards for the rest of our lives?
No comments:
Post a Comment