Letitia James on Morning Joe

She argued vigorously and well that the pervasive corruption of the NRA required its dissolution.

Not exactly a hostile venue, politically, though.

And not to say this isn't obvious political opportunism on many levels.

Her defenders have to say this chance to kill off a critical enemy organization is a windfall for the Democrats legitimated by the facts.

Legitimate opportunism, so to speak.

Legally, the NRA really should be dissolved.

They have to say.

"Battle of Seattle"?

How many towns are actually affected by the rioting, and how serious is the mess in those towns?

The Democratic media are siding with Democratic local authorities and changing the subject, attacking the Duce (Trump is Mussolini!) and the federales (Jackbooted thugs! Unconstitutional incursions! Unmarked cars!).

The GOP media (meaning Fox and a bunch of websites) are attacking the Democratic local authorities as so many red (Commie) foxes policing henhouses (The cities are on fire! They're coming to your city! The rioters want to destroy America and the Democrats want the same thing!).

A much worse and more prolonged Battle of Seattle x 50 or a light breeze in a few teacups?

Coverup by the one side and wild exaggeration by the other?

The Lincoln Project's newest ads.

How it starts. The Nazi president.

Trumpfeld. The Alzheimer's president.

(By the way, count back by sevens = count back by ten and add three, each time.)

(Or, count back by sevens = [100 - (7 x n)], starting with n = 1. But that seems harder rather than easier.)

Ask yourself what is the agenda so many Democrats seem to agree rioting, weeks of rioting, can be legitimately used to advance?

Because while lots of Democrats are defending it, some officials are actually enabling and even to a degree participating in the rioting.

To advance that agenda.

Probably most Democrats are not on board for all that radical racial stuff, and independents certainly aren't.

In a very real sense, the party has been hijacked by lots of people, including loads way more radical than the Bernie Bros.

And the Bros, starting with Bernie, have been pretty clear all along what they think of Democrats.

Hate speech, hate propaganda, and projection of their own racist bigotries

Kaepernick's New Producer: Let's Face It, Every Single Trump Voter is a Straight-Up Racist

She is absolutely not the only person on the racial left to say or think this.

It's a reflection of their own racism, and of the increasing influence and respectability of black racism on the left and in the Democratic Party.

Within recent years, the best evidence for the Republican claim that reverse racism is stronger and more dangerous in American politics than white racism has been the fury of the racist propaganda in the months just before scheduled congressional or presidential elections.

A helpful reminder why some whites voted for the Great Fat Orange Klansman

Zerlina Maxwell And 'The End Of White Politics'

She spends a lot of time on MSNBC insisting on the unique importance of the black vote, pushing for a fairly radical racial leftist agenda and defending vandalism of any white monument, so far as I can tell.

Might not be entirely right, so, cum grano salis.

Still, she (probably) and many others (certainly) on that network and at CNN and BBC News, many of them white, validate the warnings of what now seems an age ago, when Trump and others first claimed it's not really just about public honors for the Confederacy.

It's about a veto on any public honors exercised by agents of the racial left for whom not many whites would be allowed monuments in the United States of America, or perhaps in any white settler-state in the world.

If even Lincoln doesn't pass your test . . . .

Her anticipation of the eventual demographic eclipse of whites and her insistence that the Democrats behave as though it's already happened and magically made blacks the US majority, or at least the majority of the Democratic Party (it absolutely won't do the former and probably won't do the latter), will seem excessive to many and scary to some.

[The online CIA Factbook says the US is still over 70 % white and about 13 % black and above 15% all others. Hispanic is not a race but an ethnicity, and Hispanics may be of any race and are so counted in the US census.]

[Political sites or organizations of any persuasion seem all to insist it's really about non-Hispanic whites rather than whites in general. Because why? Justices Sotomayor and the late Cardozo not white enough? Does Juan Carlos de Borbón seem a little too dark?]

She wants the Democrats to behave like a nonwhite - a racial left party is what she really means - party, at least as regards its agenda, and to more or less ignore the (non-racial left) whites who presumably make up an actual majority of its voters, members, and officials by a pretty long way.

She says this is what they need to do to win elections; trying to bring back white Obama voters who went with Trump last time - who make no sense at all to me - won't work.

Of course she says that.

Given the outsize roll she wants for the racial left and their ludicrous, anti-white agenda, what else would she say?

MSNBC and CNN and Donald Trump are all just fine with that.

Miller, Bannon, and even David Duke will send her fan mail and flowers.

Considerably more than three minutes hate

was visited on Kevin McCarthy for a rather anodyne campaign tweet.

The abuse, heavily obscene, focused on racial fury, the Russia connection, and Putin in particular.

'Dear Kevin,' 'Dear Republicans' Trend, As GOPLeader Impugns Democrats' Patriotism

To the immense joy of Kevin Scarce.

Do American blacks hate whites and white America the way Arabs hate Jews and Israel?

No doubt.

More than seventy years of liberal shouting about white racism and black rage and about how they, too, would riot and destroy and hate white people have had a marked impact, encouraging black rage and black belief in white racism.

As was intended, all that time.

White people are aware.

And the hate propaganda becomes earsplitting during election years, especially presidential years.

Why do you suppose so many whites think black hatred of them, "reverse racism", is the biggest problem in American today, bigger than white hatred of blacks?

All those decades of left wing hate propaganda had an impact on whites, too.

And yet they (we) put Obama in the White House, twice, though we knew he had very sore toes about race.

Twice.

And to this day those whites think he may have been the finest president in a long time.

The most presidential in a very, very long time.

CNN and MSNBC using indigenista- and other racial - ire to bash Trump's Rushmore super-spreader

Tiresome, and as we get ever closer to the election you can be sure CNN and MSNBC with grow ever more shrill and ever more focused on themes of the racial left.

Presidential elections bring out the worst in both parties: the most extremist views of their activist outliers.

For Democrats, that includes lefties of all sorts who actually despise the party and most of its voters, and especially its white voters, for their politics and many also for their white race.

Yes, the Democrats are a majority white party, and absolutely need white money and white votes to have a chance.

The closer we get to a presidential election the less you would know that, from the propaganda.

Who has not noticed the increasingly vocal urging of the moral necessity of reparations and the utter racist immorality of opposing them or refusing them, on both networks?

In the present case, Rushmore is now denounced by CNN and MSNBC opinionators according to two lines dear the left who swear by Zinn and for whom A People's History of the United States is just true history rather than an essay in anti-American hatred virtually inventing the weaponization of history.

First, as racist in that the sculptor is alleged to have had some sympathy with the Klan, though never a member in an era when membership was without social or political cost.

And second, as a sin against sacred Indian lands (but the tribes agreed with the project at the time) and a evil validation of the also racist European settling and rise to dominance in the Americas.

A crime in public is still a crime. A crime boss acting in public is all the more egregiously a crime boss.

Not just Ukraine, Trump now calls for China to probe Bidens

What the media not in his corner and Democratic blogs claim is proof he is a narcissist is proof he is a psychopathic (sociopathic?) criminal like the Al Capone character of The Untouchables.

Why they prefer to hit him with a shrink-speak label they have to explain every time they use it to just calling him the crime boss and thug he is, citing exactly the same proofs, something that would need no explaining, is a mystery of the liberal mind.

An absurd question, with the Duce still in the White House and apt to stay four more years

Absurd?

Yes and even stupid.

Too gaffe-prone to be president? Biden's blunders prompt fresh scrutiny.

So The Times is too conservative?

People say that a lot at Dem sites where both "socialism" and socialism are popular, and capitalism is not.

In recent weeks, The Times' front page has been relentlessly hammering Trump, the GOP, the USA, white men, and white people in general for racism, sexism, homophobia, and other sins too numerous and too diverse for me to recall them all right now, featuring multiple attacks above the fold (online edition, of course) every single day.

At least half the links and stories above the fold, and often more than that, are such attacks, nearly all of which at least include if they are not limited to the charge of racism.

But the ever more conspicuous Zinnite influence on The Times, actually more strident some days than The Guardian, shows increasingly in anti-capitalism, too.

As in this story, in which hammering the US for racism and slavery (ended by white people at the cost of some 700,000 dead, 154 years ago) provides a natural segue into hammering the US for capitalism.

In order to understand the brutality of American capitalism, you have to start on the plantation.

And yet, in this editorial - from the board, the publisher, and the editor, however, and in no way representing the newsroom or op-ed section - we see a defense of the Hong Kong rebels and a clear loathing of the red dictatorship of Beijing.

Hong Kong’s Challenge to Xi Jinping’s Iron Rule

All the same, most of the news stories concerning the situation have been sympathetic to the protesters and their aims.

C&L in the lead, this morning.

The Russians are coming and racism, racism!

That's all they've got, the left-wing-noise-machine.

A furious shit-storm of both.

Lying left wing noise machine attacks Trump

As if that could possibly be news.

Trump wrote about rats using language tenants associations use to label white landlords racists, along with white politicians who don't spend tax money coping.

He tweeted, of an area that is very likely rat-infested, that it is rat-infested.

Ever since, the lying left wing noise machine has been claiming he was using "infested" to refer to black people in an act of egregious racism.

What Trump Talks About When He Talks About Infestations

The frightening political history of the word “infest.”

A ridiculous history of blah.

Wrong-footing white people. Again. Of course.

"White privilege" is about wrong-footing white people. Again.

It's a way to put white people in the wrong. Again.

It's a way to blame white people for not suffering the indignities, whatever they are, of minority status.

It's a way to blame them, not for what they do, but for what they don't suffer.

And we always need more and new and better ways to blame white people.

And that's racism, folks.

The racism of non-whites and the orthodox American left, from mainstream liberals onward.

Harping on it is almost as popular in liberal venues as screaming denunciations of Donald Trump's racism.

Though not quite, I admit.

I Wanted to Know What White Men Thought About Their Privilege. So I Asked.

Not a day goes by without repeated and vicious attacks on white people of one sort or another, lots of them, echoing across the left wing noise machine, all over America.

Six days and nights of relentless attacks on the president charging racism

CNN and MSNBC online and on TV, The New York Times, The Guardian, and each and every last Democrat blog and news outlet, all have been roasting Trump with unrelenting charges of racism.

Apparently, not a lot else happening worthy of our attention.

And all of this in response to a series of Tweets lobbing pretty well-deserved attacks on the Gang of Four (the soi-disant Squad), charging them all with hatred of America and telling them all to "go back where you came from".

All but one are US born, but he either didn't realize or couldn't resist.

Not one word in the tweets was racist, though the dog-whistle was rather piercing ("What? You brown girls can't actually be real Americans, can you? You're kidding, right?").

Well, the racial joke, I suppose.

Is every racial joke racist? Is every Jewish joke predicated on anti-Semitism? Is every Polish joke somehow anti-Polish?

So hellish has been the fury of the left wing noise machine that, while only one or two GOPsters have endorsed these charges, the rest have been silent.

Not a lot of GOP support out there for the Duce, on this one.