Maher, Begala clash on Clinton's alleged visit to Epstein's 'sex island': 'Look, it's possible!'
Of course.
And that Trump was there, too, bearing in mind his attitude toward that recruiter of underage girls, Ghislaine Maxwell.
Maher previously argued that Bill and Hillary Clinton should not appear at the Democrats' convention this summer due to their controversial brand.
However, recent reports indicate both will participate when the Democrats convene beginning Aug. 17.
The pseudonym "Philo Vaihinger" has been abandoned. All posts have been and are written by me, Joseph Auclair.
Showing posts with label Bill Clinton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bill Clinton. Show all posts
Saturday, August 8, 2020
Monday, December 30, 2019
He said what?
Joe Biden says he would consider a Republican for his running mate
Doddering off into senility, is he?
Almost as idiotically offensive to the true blue as Clinton's repulsive kiss of the Republican ass, "The era of Big Government is over."
What is Big Government?
The regulatory and welfare state.
The progressive state.
Everything built to tame capitalism and protect everybody who isn't a capitalist since McKinley's day.
Doddering off into senility, is he?
Almost as idiotically offensive to the true blue as Clinton's repulsive kiss of the Republican ass, "The era of Big Government is over."
What is Big Government?
The regulatory and welfare state.
The progressive state.
Everything built to tame capitalism and protect everybody who isn't a capitalist since McKinley's day.
Friday, December 27, 2019
Trump derangement syndrome
From the night of the election many of the more committed Dems have cast about for ways to get rid of the Duce, delegitimate his presidency, of even impeach him.
Their venomous hatred has been abundantly obvious to all.
But it is also abundantly obvious the president is exactly the stupid, ignorant thug, the mob boss, the political ass, the crook, the sexual predator, the instinctive racist, and the national disgrace they have always said he is.
And it is equally true that his crimes, at least as bad as Nixon's and in many ways similar to Nixon's, do justify removal from office.
The truth of the complaint that the Big Dog also deserved to be removed from office makes Trump no less worthy of removal.
But it does remind us payback is a bitch.
Their venomous hatred has been abundantly obvious to all.
But it is also abundantly obvious the president is exactly the stupid, ignorant thug, the mob boss, the political ass, the crook, the sexual predator, the instinctive racist, and the national disgrace they have always said he is.
And it is equally true that his crimes, at least as bad as Nixon's and in many ways similar to Nixon's, do justify removal from office.
The truth of the complaint that the Big Dog also deserved to be removed from office makes Trump no less worthy of removal.
But it does remind us payback is a bitch.
Monday, December 23, 2019
Payback is a bitch
Joe Scarborough is fine with the impeachment and removal of Donald Trump but he will not let anyone get away with denying that Clinton, too, committed impeachable offenses.
It wasn't about Lewinsky so much as perjury before congress and in court, suborning perjury, witness tampering, and more.
A whole lot of Democrats in the senate seem to have been as impervious to evidence as today's senate Republicans.
And as unwilling to agree that the offenses involved deserved removal from office.
Like Scarborough, I always loathed the Big Dog.
But I suspect for opposite political reasons, if perhaps for very similar ones related to Clinton as a person, a human being, and a man.
Yes, I'm thinking a whole lot of Republicans believe, like Scarborough, that the Democrats' refusal to remove Bill from office was sheer partisan defiance of his manifest just deserts.
And that may provide them much peace of mind concerning their own current refusal to remove the Duce.
It wasn't about Lewinsky so much as perjury before congress and in court, suborning perjury, witness tampering, and more.
A whole lot of Democrats in the senate seem to have been as impervious to evidence as today's senate Republicans.
And as unwilling to agree that the offenses involved deserved removal from office.
Like Scarborough, I always loathed the Big Dog.
But I suspect for opposite political reasons, if perhaps for very similar ones related to Clinton as a person, a human being, and a man.
Yes, I'm thinking a whole lot of Republicans believe, like Scarborough, that the Democrats' refusal to remove Bill from office was sheer partisan defiance of his manifest just deserts.
And that may provide them much peace of mind concerning their own current refusal to remove the Duce.
Tuesday, November 5, 2019
High Crimes and Misdemeanors
I can't really see that having sex with an intern is an impeachable offense, though it was way worse than merely tacky.
But Trump's entire term has been an uninterrupted string of impeachable offenses, and the Republicans will give him a pass on all of them.
That is how far their republicanism and devotion to the constitution and the historic American republic are all fake news.
But Trump's entire term has been an uninterrupted string of impeachable offenses, and the Republicans will give him a pass on all of them.
That is how far their republicanism and devotion to the constitution and the historic American republic are all fake news.
Saturday, April 20, 2019
Why is the president above the law?
The justice department reads in the invisible ink of the constitution that a sitting president cannot be indicted because it would distract him from his work, and recommends instead the far less disturbing remedy of impeachment which would distract not only the president but also the entire congress.
Ah, that's much more sensible.
Trump tampered with witnesses. These Senate Republicans voted to oust Bill Clinton for doing just that.
It is against federal law to tamper with a witness in an “official proceeding” such as Mueller’s investigation.
But Mueller’s team declined to conclude whether or not Trump’s actions were criminal, in part because justice department policy holds that sitting presidents may not be indicted.
In a move that has attracted sharp criticism from Democrats, William Barr, the attorney general, decided that Trump had not committed obstruction.
Clinton was impeached by the House of Representatives in December 1998 on charges of perjury and obstruction of justice.
The obstruction charge said he committed witness tampering by trying to “corruptly influence” the potential testimony of his secretary Betty Currie, and urged the former White House intern Monica Lewinsky to submit a false affidavit in a lawsuit against him.
Clinton was acquitted by the Senate. But 14 current Republican senators, some of whom were then serving in the House, voted either to impeach or convict Clinton on the obstruction charge.
Some specifically cited his actions toward the witnesses when explaining their votes.
The Republicans include Mitch McConnell, Chuck Grassley, Lindsey Graham, Pat Roberts, Mike Crapo, Mike Enzi, James Inhofe, Richard Shelby, Roy Blunt, Richard Burr, Jerry Moran, Rob Portman, Roger Wicker, and John Thune.
The story does not tell us who were the Democrats who voted, successfully, to acquit.
What contemptible trash these politicians are.
Ah, that's much more sensible.
Trump tampered with witnesses. These Senate Republicans voted to oust Bill Clinton for doing just that.
It is against federal law to tamper with a witness in an “official proceeding” such as Mueller’s investigation.
But Mueller’s team declined to conclude whether or not Trump’s actions were criminal, in part because justice department policy holds that sitting presidents may not be indicted.
In a move that has attracted sharp criticism from Democrats, William Barr, the attorney general, decided that Trump had not committed obstruction.
Clinton was impeached by the House of Representatives in December 1998 on charges of perjury and obstruction of justice.
The obstruction charge said he committed witness tampering by trying to “corruptly influence” the potential testimony of his secretary Betty Currie, and urged the former White House intern Monica Lewinsky to submit a false affidavit in a lawsuit against him.
Clinton was acquitted by the Senate. But 14 current Republican senators, some of whom were then serving in the House, voted either to impeach or convict Clinton on the obstruction charge.
Some specifically cited his actions toward the witnesses when explaining their votes.
The Republicans include Mitch McConnell, Chuck Grassley, Lindsey Graham, Pat Roberts, Mike Crapo, Mike Enzi, James Inhofe, Richard Shelby, Roy Blunt, Richard Burr, Jerry Moran, Rob Portman, Roger Wicker, and John Thune.
The story does not tell us who were the Democrats who voted, successfully, to acquit.
What contemptible trash these politicians are.
Wednesday, September 26, 2018
Reminds me of the worst days of Bill Clinton's Monica scandal
During which Democrats shrugged and said, "Hey, everybody goes wrong about sex. Not a big deal, right?"
Not to mention his endless lies to the America people and his lies in court, for which he was disbarred.
And remember this?
The rape allegation against Bill Clinton
GOP Senate candidate on Kavanaugh accuser: 'I mean, how many 15-year-olds handle a lot of alcohol?'
North Dakota Rep. Kevin Cramer, the Republican challenging Sen. Heidi Heitkamp, suggested the allegation of sexual and physical assault -- even if it's true -- should not disqualify Brett Kavanaugh from the Supreme Court.
Cramer's comments in a Monday interview with North Dakota television station KX4 came three days after he said the accusation against Kavanaugh was "even more absurd" than Anita Hill's accusation against Clarence Thomas because Kavanaugh and his accuser were drunk teenagers when the alleged incident occurred.
"My point was that there was no type of intercourse or anything like that," Cramer said. "That was my point, that nothing happened in terms of a sexual event beyond, obviously, the attack."
Not to mention his endless lies to the America people and his lies in court, for which he was disbarred.
And remember this?
The rape allegation against Bill Clinton
GOP Senate candidate on Kavanaugh accuser: 'I mean, how many 15-year-olds handle a lot of alcohol?'
North Dakota Rep. Kevin Cramer, the Republican challenging Sen. Heidi Heitkamp, suggested the allegation of sexual and physical assault -- even if it's true -- should not disqualify Brett Kavanaugh from the Supreme Court.
Cramer's comments in a Monday interview with North Dakota television station KX4 came three days after he said the accusation against Kavanaugh was "even more absurd" than Anita Hill's accusation against Clarence Thomas because Kavanaugh and his accuser were drunk teenagers when the alleged incident occurred.
"My point was that there was no type of intercourse or anything like that," Cramer said. "That was my point, that nothing happened in terms of a sexual event beyond, obviously, the attack."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)