The pseudonym "Philo Vaihinger" has been abandoned. All posts have been and are written by me, Joseph Auclair.
Showing posts with label Bolsonaro. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bolsonaro. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 7, 2020

Bad news for mini-Trump

Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro tests positive for coronavirus

Yeah, but he was almost trying to get it.

The Brazilian president, Jair Bolsonaro, has announced live on television he has tested positive for coronavirus.

“It came back positive,” a mask-wearing Bolsonaro told a hand-picked group of reporters on Tuesday lunchtime outside his official residence.

“There’s no reason for fear. That’s life,” the president added. 

“Life goes on. I thank God for my life and the role I’ve been given to decide the future of this great nation that is called Brazil.”

Bolsonaro, 65, has repeatedly trivialized the pandemic and flouted social distancing, even as Brazil became the second-worst-hit country after the United States, with more than 65,000 deaths and 1.6m confirmed cases.

Monday, June 1, 2020

Trump and Bolsonaro! Of course it's them!

U.S. sends 2 million hydroxychloroquine doses to Brazil

The United States has delivered two million doses of a malaria drug to Brazil for use in the fight against the coronavirus pandemic, and the two countries are embarking on a joint research effort to study whether the drug is safe and effective for the prevention and early treatment of COVID-19, the White House announced Sunday.

The White House announcement comes after months of controversy over the drug, hydroxychloroquine, which President Trump has aggressively promoted, despite a lack of scientific evidence of its effectiveness as a treatment for COVID-19. 

Mr. Trump stunned public health experts recently by saying he was taking a two-week course of the medicine.

Thursday, May 7, 2020

Better than even he'll get the bug, I say

Trump's personal valet tests positive for coronavirus

President Donald Trump and Vice President Mike Pence have since tested negative for the virus, the White House said Thursday.

One of President Donald Trump's personal valets, who works in the West Wing serving the president his meals among other duties, has tested positive for the coronavirus, the closest the virus is known to have come to the president, a White House official said.

Since the White House medical unit was made aware of the case, Trump and Vice President Mike Pence have both tested negative for the virus, White House spokesman Hogan Gidley said Thursday.

The White House did not say when the person developed symptoms or when the president was last exposed to the individual, whom Gidley described as a military official. 

It can sometimes take several days for the virus to appear on a test once a person has been infected.

Him, too, at a guess.

And he is so like Trump, wouldn't you say?

Brazil: largest rise in Covid-19 deaths follows Bolsonaro 'worst is over' claim

Brazil has seen its largest ever daily increase in its coronavirus death toll, despite erroneous suggestions from President Jair Bolsonaro that the worst of the crisis was over.

Brazil – which is now considered a major global centre of the pandemic – reported 633 Covid-19 deaths on Tuesday, taking its total to nearly 8,000.

Three of Brazil’s 27 states this week announced the country’s first official lockdown measures to try to slow the spread of the disease.

But speaking to reporters outside his presidential palace on Tuesday afternoon, Bolsonaro suggested his country was passing its Covid-19 peak.

“I don’t know yet if the number of deaths is less than yesterday. But if it is, if I’m not mistaken, it’ll be the sixth consecutive day in which the number of deaths has fallen,” Bolsonaro said.

“That’s a sign that the worst is over, and I ask God for this to be true,” Bolsonaro added.

It was not true. Just a few hours later, Brazil’s health ministry announced that the number of reported deaths had in fact risen. 

Monday, April 20, 2020

So, who doesn't think he's got it? Bolsonaro coughing his head off at a rally against anti-virus measures

Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro denounced for joining pro-dictatorship rally

Not exaggeration, not hyperbole, not figurative rather than literal language.

They mean it outright, and it's true.

Former presidents, politicians and newspaper editorial boards have lined up to denounce the “moronic” and “anti-democratic” behaviour of Brazil’s far-right leader after he hit the streets to egg on protesters demanding a return to military dictatorship.

As the number of deaths caused by Covid-19 rose to nearly 2,500 on Sunday, Jair Bolsonaro left his presidential palace in Brazil’s capital, Brasília, to fraternize with flag-waving radicals.

Among the demands their banners listed were an end to the social distancing measures opposed by Bolsonaro, the closure of Brazil’s congress and supreme court, and a re-run of a dictatorship-era decree used by military rulers in the late 1960s to suffocate their political opponents.

. . . .

“The era of roguery is over. Now it’s the people who are in power,” Bolsonaro proclaimed outside the Brazilian army headquarters, coughing repeatedly as he spoke.

“Everyone in Brazil must understand that they must yield to the will of the Brazilian people.”

. . . .

On Monday morning Bolsonaro denied he had been attacking Brazilian democracy but told reporters: “I am actually the Constitution”.

Bolsonaro is a longstanding fan of the military men who ruled Brazil from 1964 until 1985, and autocrats including Chile’s Augusto Pinochet.

Thursday, April 9, 2020

Every bit as stupid as he looks

Influencers among 'key distributors' of coronavirus misinformation

Celebrities and politicians with large social media followings are proving to be key distributors of disinformation relating to coronavirus, according to a study that suggests the factcheckers and mainstream news outlets are struggling to compete with the reach of influencers.

The actor Woody Harrelson and the singer MIA have faced criticism after sharing baseless claims about the supposed connection of 5G to the pandemic, while comments by the likes of the Brazilian president, Jair Bolsonaro, playing down the scale of the crisis in the face of scientific evidence have attracted criticism in recent days.

Thursday, March 26, 2020

Brazil: Two weeks ahead of us

Virus has Brazil’s Bolsonaro facing governor ‘insurrection’

Brazil’s governors on Wednesday rebelled against President Jair Bolsonaro’s call for life to return to pre-coronavirus normalcy, saying his proposal to reopen schools and businesses runs counter to recommendations from health experts and endangers Latin America’s largest population.

State governors, many of whom have adopted strict measures to limit gatherings in their regions, defied the president’s instructions in a nationwide address Tuesday evening that they lift the restrictions and limit isolation only to the elderly and those with longstanding health problems.

The governors weren’t the only defiant ones. 

Virus plans challenged by Bolsonaro were upheld by the Supreme Court. 

The heads of both congressional houses criticized his televised speech. Companies donated supplies to state anti-virus efforts. 

And even some of his staunch supporters joined his detractors.

Thursday, March 19, 2020

The apple doesn't fall far . . . .

Bolsonaro’s son blames China for coronavirus crisis


Beijing’s ambassador to Brazil has launched a stinging attack on the son of its far-right president, Jair Bolsonaro, after he claimed the Chinese Communist party was to blame for the coronavirus crisis sweeping the world.

On Wednesday, Bolsonaro’s influential politician son Eduardo – who many regard as Brazil’s de facto foreign minister and has close ties to Steve Bannon – enraged Beijing with an incendiary tweet about its role in the pandemic.

“It’s China’s fault,” Bolsonaro claimed on Twitter, retweeting a message that said: “The blame for the global coronavirus pandemic has a name and surname: the Chinese Communist party.”

That remark drew a ferocious rebuke from senior Chinese diplomats, who have become increasingly combative since Xi Jinping – an authoritarian leader regarded as China’s most powerful since Mao Zedong – took power in 2012.

Yang Wanming, Beijing’s top diplomat in Brazil, demanded an immediate retraction and apology for the “evil insult”, while his embassy accused Eduardo Bolsonaro of contracting “a mental virus” during a recent trip to the United States.

“Your words are extremely irresponsible,” the embassy in Brasília tweeted.

“Regrettably, you’re someone lacking both international vision and common sense, knowing neither China nor the world,” the Chinese embassy added.

“We would advise you not to be in such a hurry to be the US’ spokesperson in Brazil – you’ll fall flat on your face.”

According to reports in the Brazilian media Yang also retweeted a message that read: “The Bolsonaro family is the great poison of this country.”

The row coincides with a deepening diplomatic row over the disease between Beijing and Washington, which was exacerbated by Donald Trump’s insistence on referring to the coronavirus as “the Chinese virus”.

Friday, November 29, 2019

So like Trump it's scary

Brazil’s president claims DiCaprio paid for Amazon fires

Brazil’s president has falsely accused the actor and environmentalist Leonardo DiCaprio of bankrolling the deliberate incineration of the Amazon rainforest.

Jair Bolsonaro – a populist nationalist who has vowed to drive environmental NGOs from Brazil – made the claim on Friday, reportedly telling supporters: “This Leonardo DiCaprio’s a cool guy, isn’t he? Giving money for the Amazon to be torched.”

The spurious accusation – for which Brazil’s president offered no proof – came 24 hours after Bolsonaro made a similarly unsubstantiated claim in a Facebook live broadcast.

“Leonardo DiCaprio, dammit, you’re collaborating with the burning of the Amazon,” Bolsonaro declared, accusing the actor of being part of an international “campaign against Brazil”.

Bolsonaro’s unsubstantiated allegations relate to the controversial arrest on Tuesday of four volunteer firefighters whom local police accused – also apparently without evidence – of setting fire to the forest in order to boost fundraising efforts for an international NGO.

The firefighters were released on Thursday amid widespread public outrage at their treatment and questions over the police investigation.

On Thursday Bolsonaro’s politician son Eduardo claimed on Twitter that DiCaprio had donated $300,000 (£230,000) to “the NGO that set fire to the Amazon” and accused the conservation group WWF of paying the NGO about £13,000 for photographs of the burning forest.

. . . .

In August – as huge fires swept through the Amazon region sparking an international crisis – DiCaprio pledged $5m to help protect Brazil’s rainforests.

Friday, June 14, 2019

Bernie's attack on "oligarchy"

He attacks capitalism while evading the question what is the socialism he actually favors over capitalism.

Just as he did during the campaign of 2016.

Bernie Sanders defines his vision for democratic socialism in the United States

When we talk about oligarchy, let us be clear about what we mean. 

Right now, in the United States of America, three families control more wealth than the bottom half of our country, some 160 million Americans. 

The top 1% own more wealth than the bottom 92% and 49% of all new income generated today goes to the top 1%. 

In fact, income and wealth inequality today in the United States is greater than at any time since the 1920s.

He says he is going to tell us what he means by "oligarchy" and then he does not.

To claim this word means anything else than what it actually means is just lying.
noun, plural ol·i·gar·chies.
  1. a form of government in which all power is vested in a few persons or in a dominant class orclique; government by the few.
  2. a state or organization so ruled.
  3. the persons or class so ruling.
Taken literally, every government in the world today is an oligarchy, including any republic, no matter how benign.

But historically the word has usually been understood to mean government by a minority not itself subject to any legal, constitutional, or political control.

In short, absolute or despotic government by a few.

And that is not what Bernie is ranting about and we in America do not live under any such government.

He is ranting about capitalism.

He begins by reciting statistics about income and wealth inequality, both of which are inescapable under capitalism and have never been actually escaped under socialism.

"Wealth inequality" as he uses it is another label for private ownership of the means of production, the defining feature that differentiates capitalism from socialism.

He continues, quoting more statistics, many truly disturbing, in a like tone of furious rage.

And when we talk about oligarchy, it is not just that the very rich are getting much richer. 

It is that tens of millions of working-class people, in the wealthiest country on earth, are suffering under incredible economic hardship, desperately trying to survive.

Today, nearly 40 million Americans live in poverty and tonight, 500,000 people will be sleeping out on the streets. 

About half of the country lives paycheck to paycheck as tens of millions of our people are an accident, a divorce, a sickness or a layoff away from economic devastation.

While many public schools throughout the country lack the resources to adequately educate our young people, we are the most heavily incarcerated nation on earth.

After decades of policies that have encouraged and subsidized unbridled corporate greed, we now have an economy that is fundamentally broken and grotesquely unfair.

Ignoring history, pretending somehow we should have expected quite the opposite, he complains.

Globally, the situation is even more shocking with most of the world’s wealth concentrated among a very few, while billions of people have almost nothing. 

Today, the world’s richest 26 billionaires now own as much wealth as the poorest 3.8 billion people on the planet – half of the world’s population.

Only after this savage denunciation of the object of his lifelong hatred does he address politics.

Across the globe, the [fictitious - PV] movement toward oligarchy runs parallel to the growth of authoritarian regimes – like Putin in Russia, Xi in China, Mohamed Bin Salman in Saudi Arabia, Rodrigo Duterte in the Philippines, Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil, and Viktor Orbán in Hungary among others.

These leaders meld corporatist economics with xenophobia and authoritarianism. 

They redirect popular anger about inequality and declining economic conditions into violent rage against minorities — whether they are immigrants, racial minorities, religious minorities or the LGBT community. 

And to suppress dissent, they are cracking down on democracy and human rights.

He continues with a by now commonplace and absurdly hyperbolic comparison of our own time to the 1930s.

This authoritarian playbook is not new. 

The challenge we confront today as a nation, and as a world, is in many ways not different from the one we faced a little less than a century ago, during and after the Great Depression in the 1930s.

Then, as now, deeply-rooted and seemingly intractable economic and social disparities led to the rise of right-wing nationalist forces all over the world.

He extends the comparison over several paragraphs and then returns to the demons of the present, according to him.

Today, America and the world are once again moving towards authoritarianism — and the same right-wing forces of oligarchy, corporatism, nationalism, racism and xenophobia are on the march, pushing us to make the apocalyptically wrong choice that Europe made in the last century.

Today, we now see a handful of billionaires with unprecedented wealth and power.

We see huge private monopolies — operating outside of any real democratic oversight and often subsidized by taxpayers – with the power to control almost every aspect of our lives.

They are the profit-taking gatekeepers of our health care, our technology, our finance system, our food supply and almost all of the other basic necessities of life. 

They are Wall Street, the insurance companies, the drug companies, the fossil fuel industry, the military industrial complex, the prison industrial complex and giant agri-businesses.

They are the entities with unlimited wealth who surround our nation’s capitol with thousands of well-paid lobbyists, who to a significant degree write the laws that we live under.

Today, we have a demagogue in the White House who, for cheap political gain, is attempting to deflect the attention of the American people away from the real crises that we face and, instead, is doing what demagogues always do — and that is divide people up and legislate hatred. 

This is a president who supports brutal family separations, border walls, Muslim bans, anti-LGBT policies, deportations and voter suppression.

It is my very strong belief that the United States must reject that path of hatred and divisiveness — and instead find the moral conviction to choose a different path, a higher path, a path of compassion, justice and love.

It is the path that I call democratic socialism.

And yet what he calls for is far from that, and this champion of Eugene Debs knows that very well.

So why does he call it that?

God knows.

But the fix he calls for is not far from what the first Roosevelt, TR, himself urged in 1912.

Today, in the second decade of the 21st century, we must take up the unfinished business of the New Deal and carry it to completion.

This is the unfinished business of the Democratic Party and the vision we must accomplish.

In order to accomplish that goal, it means committing ourselves to protecting political rights, to protecting civil rights – and to protect economic rights of all people in this country.

As FDR stated in his 1944 State of the Union address: “We have come to a clear realization of the fact that true individual freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence.”

Today, our Bill of Rights guarantees the American people a number of important constitutionally protected political rights. 

And while we understand that these rights have not always been respected and we have so much more work to do, we are proud that our constitution guarantees freedom of religion, freedom of expression, freedom of assembly, a free press and other rights because we understand that we can never have true American freedom unless we are free from authoritarian tyranny.

Now, we must take the next step forward and guarantee every man, woman and child in our country basic economic rights – the right to quality health care, the right to as much education as one needs to succeed in our society, the right to a good job that pays a living wage, the right to affordable housing, the right to a secure retirement, and the right to live in a clean environment.

We must recognize that in the 21st century, in the wealthiest country in the history of the world, economic rights are human rights.

That is what I mean by democratic socialism.

Still, this is true and fair enough.

Let me be clear. I do understand that I and other progressives will face massive attacks from those who attempt to use the word “socialism” as a slur. 

But I should also tell you that I have faced and overcome these attacks for decades — and I am not the only one.

Let us remember that in 1932, Republican President Herbert Hoover claimed that Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal was, “a disguise for the totalitarian state.”

In 1936 former Democratic New York Governor and presidential candidate Al Smith said in a speech about FDR’s New Deal policies, “Just get the platform of the Democratic Party and get the platform of the Socialist Party and lay them down on your dining-room table, side by side.”

When President Harry Truman proposed a national health care program, the American Medical Association hired Ronald Reagan as their pitchman.

The AMA called the legislation that stemmed from his proposal “socialized medicine” claiming that White House staff were, “followers of the Moscow party line.”

In 1960, Ronald Reagan in a letter to Richard Nixon wrote the following about John F. Kennedy: “Under the tousled boyish haircut is still old Karl Marx.”

In the 1990s, then Congressman Newt Gingrich claimed President Bill Clinton’s health care plan was “centralized bureaucratic socialism.”

The conservative Heritage Foundation has claimed that the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) was “a step towards socialism.”

Former Speaker of the House John Boehner claimed the stimulus package, the omnibus spending bill and the budget proposed by President Barack Obama were “all one big down payment on a new American socialist experiment.”

In this regard, President Harry Truman was right when he said that: “Socialism is the epithet they have hurled at every advance the people have made in the last 20 years…

"Socialism is what they called Social Security. 

"Socialism is what they called farm price supports. 

"Socialism is what they called bank deposit insurance. 

"Socialism is what they called the growth of free and independent labor organizations. Socialism is their name for almost anything that helps all the people.”

If you are the Trump family, you got $885 million worth of tax breaks and subsidies for your family’s housing empire that is built on racial discrimination.

When Trump screams socialism, all of his hypocrisy will not be lost on the American people. Americans will know that he is attacking all that we take for granted: from Social Security to Medicare to veterans health care to roads and bridges to public schools to national parks to clean water and clean air.

When Trump attacks socialism, I am reminded of what Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. said, “This country has socialism for the rich, rugged individualism for the poor.”

And that is the difference between Donald Trump and me. 

He believes in corporate socialism for the rich and powerful.

I believe in a democratic socialism that works for the working families of this country.

And then he adopts a line taken by liberals at least since Dewey regarding "true freedom".

(Google "persuasive definition" and "No true Scotsman")

What I believe is that the American people deserve freedom – true freedom. 

Freedom is an often used word but it’s time we took a hard look at what that word actually means.

Ask yourself: what does it actually mean to be free?

Are you truly free if you are unable to go to a doctor when you are sick, or face financial bankruptcy when you leave the hospital?

Are you truly free if you cannot afford the prescription drug you need to stay alive?

Are you truly free when you spend half of your limited income on housing, and are forced to borrow money from a payday lender at 200% interest rates.

Are you truly free if you are 70 years old and forced to work because you lack a pension or enough money to retire?

Are you truly free if you are unable to go to attend college or a trade school because your family lacks the income?

Are you truly free if you are forced to work 60 or 80 hours a week because you can’t find a job that pays a living wage?

Are you truly free if you are a mother or father with a new born baby but you are forced to go back to work immediately after the birth because you lack paid family leave?

Are you truly free if you are a small business owner or family farmer who is driven out by the monopolistic practices of big business?

Are you truly free if you are a veteran, who put your life on the line to defend this country, and now sleep out on the streets?

To me, the answer to those questions, in the wealthiest nation on earth, is no, you are not free.

. . . .


In 1944, FDR proposed an economic bill of rights but died a year later and was never able to fulfil that vision. Our job, 75 years later, is to complete what Roosevelt started.


That is why today, I am proposing a 21st Century Economic Bill of Rights.

A Bill of Rights that establishes once and for all that every American, regardless of his or her income in entitled to:
  • The right to a decent job that pays a living wage
  • The right to quality health care
  • The right to a complete education
  • The right to affordable housing
  • The right to a clean environment
  • The right to a secure retirement
Over the course of this election my campaign has been releasing — and will continue to release — detailed proposals addressing each of these yet to be realized economic rights.

We will also address the attacks that are being launched each day against the civil rights and civil liberties of our people.

And then the cat is out of the bag for all this oligarchy stuff.

At the end of the day, the one percent may have enormous wealth and power, but they are just the one percent. 

When the 99 percent stand together, we can transform society.

These are my values, and that is why I call myself a democratic socialist.

At its core is a deep and abiding faith in the American people to peacefully and democratically enact the transformative change that will create shared prosperity, social equality and true freedom for all.

Wednesday, April 17, 2019

They've got this mainstreamed, now. Globally.

Seems like it's only been a few years since National Review began floating this bullshit.

Brazil's president calls Nazis leftists after Israel Holocaust museum visit

Be glad Reuters isn't playing along.

Brazil’s right-wing President Jair Bolsonaro said “there is no doubt” that Nazism was a leftist movement, just after visiting Israel’s Yad Vashem Holocaust memorial and museum.

Bolsonaro’s remarks directly contradicted information on the museum’s website saying Germany’s Nazi movement rose out of right-wing radical groups responding to the rise of communism.

In Tuesday’s televised comments, the Brazilian president echoed previous remarks by his country’s foreign minister, Ernesto Araujo, also claiming the Nazis were leftists.

Asked by reporters if he agreed with Araujo, Bolsonaro said, “There is no doubt, right?”

He went on to say that the Nazi party’s name was the National Socialist Party of Germany, which includes the word “socialist.” The official name was the National Socialist German Workers’ Party.

Despite their name, the Nazis followed a fascist and anti-Semitic - rather than a socialist - ideology.

And is this him cozying up close to Holocaust denial, as close as he so far dares?

Bolsonaro forgives the Nazis for the Holocaust.

President Jair Bolsonaro of Brazil drew Israel’s ire on Saturday for saying the crimes of the Holocaust are forgivable.

Mr. Bolsonaro made the comments Thursday night at a meeting with evangelical pastors in Rio de Janeiro. 

He was talking about his visit to the Holocaust memorial in Jerusalem earlier this month.

“We can forgive. But we cannot forget,” he said of the Holocaust, adding that action was needed to ensure its horrors were not repeated. 

“Those who forget the past are condemned to not have a future,” he added.

Evangelicals are the same everywhere, eh?

They seem everywhere to prefer to support authoritarian wingnuts.

Saturday, April 13, 2019

What were they thinking, inviting him? Ah. They didn't.

Gala Honoree Causes Concern at American Museum of Natural History

The American Museum of Natural History says it is exploring its options after discovering that the honoree at a gala to which it rented space next month will be President Jair Bolsonaro of Brazil, whose environmental policies have come under fire.

In statements Thursday and Friday, the museum responded to criticism that an institution dedicated to nature and science would serve as a podium to honor someone who has proposed opening up more of the Amazon rain forest to mining and agribusiness.

The event is an annual gala honoring a Person of the Year Award organized by the Brazilian-American Chamber of Commerce, a nonprofit that promotes business and cultural ties between the United States and Brazil.

The museum said it had agreed to book the event this year before it learned who the nominee would be, and its remarks suggested it might be considering whether there is any way to back out of hosting the engagement.

Monday, April 1, 2019

So, this happened.

For all I know, he's right.

But the dictatorship was so awful that that benefit seems almost an unintended side-effect brought about by people determined to carry out horrific crimes of their own.

I was fifteen that year.

And he was nine.

Fujimori saved Peru and Pinochet saved Chile, the latter launching a dictatorship that was also an orgy of murder and other crimes.

Brésil : le coup d’État de 1964 a “sauvé” le pays, selon la présidence

Voilà plusieurs jours que l’ordre donné par Jair Bolsonaro au ministère de la Défense d’organiser des fêtes de commémoration dans les casernes, en hommage au coup d’État militaire de 1964, faisait polémique. 

Face aux critiques, le président brésilien, ancien capitaine de réserve, avait même paru faire marche arrière, affirmant jeudi qu’il ne s’agissait pas de fêter mais juste de se souvenir de cet événement, point de départ de deux décennies de dictature (1964-1985). 

Vendredi, une juge fédérale de Brasilia avait ordonné l’interdiction de toute commémoration.

Mais dès le lendemain, une autre magistrate de la cour d’appel brésilienne a annulé cette décision. 

Dimanche 31 mars, jour du 55e anniversaire du coup d’État, le palais présidentiel a ainsi pu diffuser une vidéo “qui évoque [cette date] comme un moment de l’histoire où l’armée ‘a sauvé’ le Brésil” de la menace communiste, relève le journal O Globo.

Brazil military takes up coup commemoration at Bolsonaro's behest

Brazil’s armed forces on Sunday paid tribute to a 1964 coup leading to a two-decade dictatorship, after far-right President Jair Bolsonaro - who argues that military intervention saved the country from communism - reversed an 8-year-ban on celebrations.

. . . .

The move has stirred debate and underscored Bolsonaro’s support for a military government that executed hundreds, tortured thousands, shuttered Congress and left most Brazilians with dark memories of the period.

The military has not been allowed to observe the 1964 coup since 2011, when former President Dilma Rousseff, a one-time leftist guerrilla who was imprisoned and tortured under the dictatorship, ordered an end to events marking the date.

Brazil’s Defense Ministry said the armed forces will not hold public commemorations on Sunday. Bolsonaro is traveling abroad, but scheduled an event at the presidential palace on Friday to mark the anniversary with top military brass.

Bolsonaro, a retired Army captain, has long praised the 1964-85 military government and often said its biggest mistake was not killing enough leftists. 

Early in his political career [That would be early in the 1990s. PV] he said on the floor of Congress that he was “in favor of a dictatorship” and that Brazil would “never resolve grave national problems with this irresponsible democracy.”

He's way further out on the right than I thought.

It's one thing to chose a capitalist dictatorship as a lesser evil (if it is a lesser evil) to avoid a Communist takeover.

It's quite another to flat out prefer dictatorship to representative government.

Rather surprising that the US media did not call more attention to just how far right he is when reporting on his White House visit in March.

'Trump of the Tropics': Five things you should know about the Brazilian president's visit with Trump

Not a word about his attitude towards dictatorship and democracy.

Does Trump know any of that?

Would he have been briefed?

Is it part of what he likes?