The pseudonym "Philo Vaihinger" has been abandoned. All posts have been and are written by me, Joseph Auclair.

Friday, January 26, 2018

Is obstruction enough?

The idea is in the air that Mueller might well be able to prove obstruction of justice against the president and perhaps others, while not being able to prove any underlying crime such as any sort of unlawful collusion between Trump or his Trumpists and the Russians in the 2016 campaign.

And what then, if you can't rebut the defense that Bozo was only trying to end a politically driven witch hunt?

At least half the country will think that a legally unsophisticated president and crew had been goaded into blundering into the crime of obstruction, goaded in a measure deliberately, by their Democratic enemies.

Morning Joe Crew Has A Belly Laugh Over Hannity's Mueller Denial

Mueller Needs More Than Obstruction

Nixon was demonstrably seeking to conceal and obstruct investigation of an actual crime, the Watergate burglary.

No comments:

Post a Comment