Would any contemporary paper feel the need to hide somebody’s sexually
interesting parts in this way?
Did not liberals in particular join in mocking AG Ashcroft for covering
certain body parts on statues in various public buildings?
These guys are fine with the astonishing vulgar displays of
obscenity that go on at gay pride parades and Mardi Gras.
But “nigger”?
No way.
You can't even mention it in quotes or display it in images.
Unless you're bad, like me.
Let alone actually use the word in a headline, as did the West View News.
Not even for shock value and to make the liberal propaganda point.
Let alone actually use the word in a headline, as did the West View News.
Not even for shock value and to make the liberal propaganda point.
The West View News also ran a column below Collier's by
Alvin Hall, an African-American columnist, titled "This headline offends
me."
I wonder if it's regular use in black entertainment and ordinary black conversation offends him.
No, not really.
It's all part of beating up the white guys to intimidate them.
And in the present case it's part of the constant liberal propaganda war to toxify conservatism as racist along with any policy that can be spun as adverse to, or based on hostility to, non-whites and absolutely any explicitly race-conscious policies when they are pro-white but not at all when they are anti-white.
It's all part of beating up the white guys to intimidate them.
And in the present case it's part of the constant liberal propaganda war to toxify conservatism as racist along with any policy that can be spun as adverse to, or based on hostility to, non-whites and absolutely any explicitly race-conscious policies when they are pro-white but not at all when they are anti-white.
No comments:
Post a Comment