The pseudonym "Philo Vaihinger" has been abandoned. All posts have been and are written by me, Joseph Auclair.

Wednesday, May 15, 2019

Whitewashing is a thing. A different thing, I mean.

First, this is history I did not know, and it seems entirely appropriate to call this sort of thing "whitewashing", however inadvertent or thoughtless.

Not the downplaying or covering up of the evils of persons or events (though just such covering up, intentional or not, is one and perhaps the most common meaning of "whitewashing"), but memorializing history in a way that makes it only white history, ignoring the leading and broader participation of persons of color.

If American history is our history, that "our" cannot refer only to whites and that history as narrative cannot relate history as though the only leaders, or only participants, were white.

Second, if statues to these women to commemorate the good they did despite their nearly nazi racism are OK at all then so much more must be statues of Jefferson, Washington, and others commemorated not for their crimes but for the good they did or stood for.

A Whitewashed Monument to Women’s Suffrage

The New York City commission that oversees public artworks embraced a lily-white version of history in March when it approved a monument to the women’s rights movement that is scheduled to be unveiled in Central Park next year.

The two white women depicted in sculpture — Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony — played influential roles in the 19th-century struggle for women’s suffrage. 


But the duo also represented a classist and often racist faction of the movement that declined to accept African-Americans as equals.

Stanton invoked white supremacist slanders when she opposed the 15th Amendment — which ostensibly granted black men the right to vote — casting men of color as “Sambos,” tyrants and incipient rapists. 


She and Anthony compounded that offense by rendering black suffragists nearly invisible in “History of Woman Suffrage,” the multivolume history that still dominates popular thinking on the early women’s rights struggle.

It would repeat that insult to feature these two women alone in Central Park’s first suffrage monument. 


To do so would also make the city seem willfully blind to the work of black women who served at the vanguard of the fight for universal rights — and whose achievements have already shaped suffrage monuments in other cities.

Read the rest of this information rich and spot on piece.

This piece was published yesterday in the Times and the comments section is already closed.

That is absurd and annoying.

No comments:

Post a Comment