The pseudonym "Philo Vaihinger" has been abandoned. All posts have been and are written by me, Joseph Auclair.

Friday, June 21, 2013

Feminism unveiled in a war against men




It is just possible the administration is right and Taranto is right about General Helms and Captain Herrera.

It is just possible Senator McCaskill is playing to her feminist constituency and the current wave of outrage against sexual assault and rape in the military.

As you recall, the military is almost entirely made up of adolescents and young adults in very good health and fine physical condition, still driven almost as mad by their hormones as younger teens and still plagued with brains not quite fully formed, or only recently knit together.

For as long as there have been armies there have been military towns with an exceptional quota of sex workers of all kinds and exceptional levels of the kinds of violent crime and generally irresponsible and damaging behavior common among males of that age, and especially common where they gather in large concentrations.

And for that long sensible folks have warned their girls to stay away.

Joining the service, oneself, is the opposite of staying away.

The increase in the number of women in close proximity to all those hormone crazed young males has resulted in an totally predictable, totally predicted rise in sexual predation.

Throw lambs to wolves, why don’t you, and then blame the wolves?

Well, yes, of course it’s their fault.

But what about you, you bloody moron?

Oh, given the details of the situation and that Helms was right that the prosecution had not made its case, why didn’t the Captain get to stay in the service?

Why was he forced to plead to a lesser charge that would also have been deserved only if the original charge stuck?

And why is there no way to punish women who falsely accuse men and ruin their careers?

(Or maybe there is such a way, generally?)

No comments:

Post a Comment