Hunter at KOS on sex, again.
Same culture war.
For Hunter, the guy is a crackpot because he said that about
sex, you see.
Liberals are so dedicated to enabling purely recreational sex without consequences they have become the anti-child faction.
Historically and still defenders of the rights of society's adult underdogs, they have become the mortal enemies of children, born and unborn.
From earlier denial they have moved to agreeing with conservatives that there is no morally significant difference between a late term, unborn child and a just recently born infant.
But while conservatives from this conclude that late term abortion is infanticide and to be outlawed and stopped, liberals conclude actual infanticide is to be allowed, along with late term abortions.
And now Hunter plays avid defender of unilateral divorce at will for marrieds with kids of any age, refusing even to see that perhaps the interests of the children affected should be factored into a decision what the law should be.
Much as they have successfully made totally taboo the question whether same-sex couples do or don't stack up as effective and good parents, compared to straight couples.
Taboo or irrelevant.
Everything is about the rights of adults; nothing is about their possible duties toward children.
Liberals are so dedicated to enabling purely recreational sex without consequences they have become the anti-child faction.
Historically and still defenders of the rights of society's adult underdogs, they have become the mortal enemies of children, born and unborn.
From earlier denial they have moved to agreeing with conservatives that there is no morally significant difference between a late term, unborn child and a just recently born infant.
But while conservatives from this conclude that late term abortion is infanticide and to be outlawed and stopped, liberals conclude actual infanticide is to be allowed, along with late term abortions.
And now Hunter plays avid defender of unilateral divorce at will for marrieds with kids of any age, refusing even to see that perhaps the interests of the children affected should be factored into a decision what the law should be.
Much as they have successfully made totally taboo the question whether same-sex couples do or don't stack up as effective and good parents, compared to straight couples.
Taboo or irrelevant.
Everything is about the rights of adults; nothing is about their possible duties toward children.
No comments:
Post a Comment