The professional left on the victory of the Euro-skeptics

Meet The Far-Right Groups Who’ll Decide Europe’s Future

By “far right” and “extreme right” they mean, variously, nationalist, racist, opposed to gay rights integral to the latter-day sexual revolution, and opposed to the loss of sovereignty, political and economic, to the EU.

Positions on economics, the class war, or the welfare state are not mentioned and not, for them, a litmus test for “right” and “left.”

And it is really not true that all Euro-skeptic, anti-immigration parties, spokespeople, or leaders frankly alarmed by Islam are particularly opposed to the sexual revolution.

Remember Pym Fortyn?

Anybody heard of Bruce Bawer?

Sometimes the writers at this site are just silly.

Sample.

Despite its blatant Islamophobia, The Freedom Party ended up doubling its seats in the European Parliament after this year’s elections after its third-place finish in Austria.

Party leader, Heinz-Christian Strache was interviewed by The Telegraph where he defended his party’s stance by saying, “It is not about keeping Austria white, just about protecting its traditional community. We see Europe as a Christian, and we believe it’s at risk of Islamisation.”

Sorry, their seats doubled despite their Islamophobia?

[ Islamophobia = a perfectly reasonable fear of, distaste for, opposition to, or rejection of Islam. ]

Wow, that’s just splendidly reality-based.

And attributing to all of them what are in fact splinter views of a minority of them is just the standard smear we all expect from such respectable, main-stream political sites as this one.

The Roma, by the way, are a well-known tribe of thieves, the Gypsies, whose cause the left has adopted in recent decades.

Right up there with the causes of North Vietnam, Alger Hiss, the Rosenbergs, and others they have adopted.

To these writers at this site, this is extreme.

My bolding.

As is common among right-wing groups, the DPP boasts a “tough on crime” policy, speaks of the family as “the heart” of society, and insists on the importance of preserving and strengthening its national heritage.

The party takes this third position to its nationalist extreme, however, insisting that, in its own words, “Denmark is not an immigrant-country and never has been. Thus we will not accept transformation to a multiethnic society.”

Sure, the New World is full of multi-ethnic immigrant nations.

Only those who look forward to not just a global economy but a global government and a global culture (that part of the “multi” stuff is basically a hoax) think the whole world has to go that way.

By the way, if you think any non-white country on Earth would accept an immigration policy that would risk making it predominantly, or even significantly, white you are sadly in error.

And the same left that wants to turn whites into minorities, or anyway much weaker majorities, where they now dominate would certainly help non-white nations resist white colonization.

Oh, wait. 

They already did.