Dream on, senator

Collins: Won't support SCOTUS pick hostile to abortion rights

And so?

Republican Sen. Susan Collins, a key vote in the coming Supreme Court confirmation fight, said Sunday she would not support a nominee hostile to the landmark abortion ruling in Roe v. Wade.

"I would not support a nominee who demonstrated hostility to Roe v. Wade because that would mean to me that their judicial philosophy did not include a respect for established decisions, established law," Collins said on CNN's "State of the Union."

. . . .

Trump told CNN at the outset of his campaign that he would use Roe as a litmus test for Supreme Court choices, and Vice President Mike Pence likewise said during the campaign that they would see the abortion ruling in the "ash heap of history."

Nevertheless, Collins said Trump told her he would not ask a nominee how he or she would vote on Roe. 

Doesn't matter. His list was given him by the Federalist Society, and they asked all the specific questions.

She went on to say she did not believe Justice Neil Gorsuch, a conservative judge she voted to confirm last year, would vote to overturn Roe v. Wade either.

"I actually don't," she said of Gorsuch joining an opinion overturning Roe. 

"I had a very long discussion with Justice Gorsuch in my office and he pointed out to me that he is a co-author of a whole book on precedent."

In addition to her belief on Gorsuch's position, Collins also noted Chief Justice John Roberts previously expressed that Roe v. Wade had been established.

"I want a judge who will apply the law to the facts of the case with fidelity to the Constitution," Collins said. 

"Roe v. Wade is a constitutional right that is well established, and no less an authority than Chief Justice Roberts said that repeatedly at his confirmation hearing."

In a separate interview on the same program, Illinois Democratic Sen. Tammy Duckworth said she would advise her colleagues, including Collins and fellow key vote Sen. Lisa Murkowski, an Alaska Republican, not to "just trust that what somebody says to you in a conversation trying to get your vote is what's going to happen when they are on the Supreme Court."

"Justice Gorsuch told her that he would respect precedent, and yet he has voted against precedent just this week with the Janus case," Duckworth said, referring to a labor union case decided Wednesday.