"Battle of Seattle"?

How many towns are actually affected by the rioting, and how serious is the mess in those towns?

The Democratic media are siding with Democratic local authorities and changing the subject, attacking the Duce (Trump is Mussolini!) and the federales (Jackbooted thugs! Unconstitutional incursions! Unmarked cars!).

The GOP media (meaning Fox and a bunch of websites) are attacking the Democratic local authorities as so many red (Commie) foxes policing henhouses (The cities are on fire! They're coming to your city! The rioters want to destroy America and the Democrats want the same thing!).

A much worse and more prolonged Battle of Seattle x 50 or a light breeze in a few teacups?

Coverup by the one side and wild exaggeration by the other?

The Lincoln Project's newest ads.

How it starts. The Nazi president.

Trumpfeld. The Alzheimer's president.

(By the way, count back by sevens = count back by ten and add three, each time.)

(Or, count back by sevens = [100 - (7 x n)], starting with n = 1. But that seems harder rather than easier.)

Ask yourself what is the agenda so many Democrats seem to agree rioting, weeks of rioting, can be legitimately used to advance?

Because while lots of Democrats are defending it, some officials are actually enabling and even to a degree participating in the rioting.

To advance that agenda.

Probably most Democrats are not on board for all that radical racial stuff, and independents certainly aren't.

In a very real sense, the party has been hijacked by lots of people, including loads way more radical than the Bernie Bros.

And the Bros, starting with Bernie, have been pretty clear all along what they think of Democrats.