Consider Joan
Walsh's apology for Nelson Mandela’s role as a moderate in the peaceful
take-down of South African Apartheid coming after her unmitigated praise for his
commitment to armed conflict as "a revolutionary who believed in a radical redistribution of
wealth, and a global warrior against poverty" (he was a communist and a terrorist).
Some truth to this,
after all?
By the early 1970s,
the openly defiant and revolutionary New Left had spent its political capital
and was a dying movement.
But its adherents
remained committed to the cause, altering their tactics so as to work within
the system in a manner the New Left had previously chosen not to do.
These latter-day
leftists incorporated the tactics of the infamous Saul Alinsky, seeking to
change society by first infiltrating its major institutions – the schools, the
media, the churches, the entertainment industry, the labor unions, and the
three branches of government – and then implementing policies from those
positions of power.
Most notably, the
ex-New Leftists found a home in the Democratic Party.
Or among the liberal pundit class, particularly in Blogland, including those who were too young or were, or are, fellow-travelers of the New Left.
(Yes, I know what "red diapers" actually means. So?)
(Wasn't that Gramsci, not Alinsky? "Cultural hegemony"?)
(Wasn't that Gramsci, not Alinsky? "Cultural hegemony"?)
No comments:
Post a Comment