Au contraire, one needn't so much as believe there was a historical Jesus to admire Gibson's film and understand it as an entirely traditional Christian meditation on the suffering of him who was and is to them "Our Lord."
Jews and their sympathizers, however, perfectly understandably, harbor only hatred for and mistrust of traditional Christianity, and no liberal would dare oppose those sentiments.
Hence the solid wall of liberal, led by Jewish, hatred directed at Gibson and his film.
On the other hand, it is hatred of whites that approves the ugly focus on the violence of slavery in this film, made and welcomed by people who, though outraged by the violence directed at Africans that made and kept them slaves, do not see and would not represent in the same light the violence directed at others that creates and maintains the property of the haves and makes those others have-nots, the poor, the homeless, the starving, and the wage-slaves of the haves.
They see and hate the violence directed at blacks by whites, abolished by whites at great sacrifice over one and a half centuries ago.
They are blind to or do not care where encouragement, legitimation, and inflammation of that hate goes.
Or rather, they approve, up to the point of political castration and the soft genocide of whites by demographic conquest.
But they refuse to see and would never so hate, nor dare to see others so hate, the violence at the heart of capitalism, even in little.
Though I would, up to but not beyond a certain point.
The horrific history of communism has already shown everyone where that hate goes, pushed too far.
No comments:
Post a Comment