For those who forgot, Benghazi was the scene of an al-Qaeda hit hiding behind a popular Muslim celebration of 9/11 that the administration labeled, taking its lead from the propaganda of the Muslims, deserved public outrage at a downright comical amateur video bio of Mohammed on the web.
That was their story for days.
The guy who made and put up the video was jailed for some irrelevant offense and punished far in excess of what that offense would normally warrant.
The guy who made and put up the video was jailed for some irrelevant offense and punished far in excess of what that offense would normally warrant.
There are signs the hit worked out for the killers because Hillary and the state department bureaucracy lowered security at the consulate, just in the nick of time.
Not every day is your lucky day.
Let us pause for a moment to reflect on the oddness that the left, always so quick to condemn our society for blaming the victim in cases of rape (but it's the rapist who goes to jail, is it not?), always joins the Muslims in blaming their victims, those who freely speak against them and upon whom they seek violent vengeance.
And even repression.
Is it not always the left that seeks laws to criminalize whatever speech upsets their client identity-groups, most especially and definitely including anti-Muslim but not anti-Christian blasphemy, under the label, "hate speech"?
And is it not they who also condemn - for hate! - the efforts of those who document and publicize the very real hate speech of which those client groups are themselves daily guilty?
Not every day is your lucky day.
Let us pause for a moment to reflect on the oddness that the left, always so quick to condemn our society for blaming the victim in cases of rape (but it's the rapist who goes to jail, is it not?), always joins the Muslims in blaming their victims, those who freely speak against them and upon whom they seek violent vengeance.
And even repression.
Is it not always the left that seeks laws to criminalize whatever speech upsets their client identity-groups, most especially and definitely including anti-Muslim but not anti-Christian blasphemy, under the label, "hate speech"?
And is it not they who also condemn - for hate! - the efforts of those who document and publicize the very real hate speech of which those client groups are themselves daily guilty?
No comments:
Post a Comment