Did you know the ACLU was founded as a communist front for
the purpose of advancing the subversive efforts of communism in the USA?
We are a long way from those days and the ACLU has been on
the right side of numerous issues since then, often with the blessing of
Moscow.
Of course, contemporary radicals have since 9/11 treated Muslims,
Islamic fundamentalism, and Muslim terrorism according to the maxim, “the enemy
of my enemy is my friend.”
And the ACLU has stood with them, shoulder to shoulder.
And yet the very same radical left has called for much greater
FBI watchfulness of Christian, anti-abortion groups, especially those which may
spawn actual violence and terrorism.
I have never heard of Senator Feinstein or any other Democrat
expressing objections to denigration of or spreading hatred toward Christians
of however narrowly defined a sort.
Or discriminatory, unlawful, prejudicial, or
unconstitutional “profiling” of Christian or other militia or related organizations.
American policy toward terrorism would make a lot more sense
were it not for the fact that while Christianity – primarily Protestant
Christianity – has become a client religion of the Republican Party, Islam has
become a client of the Democrats.
In this instance, Representative King may have been right.
In any case, the suggestion should be debated on its merits
rather being rejected out of hand, as it seems to have been by Senator
Feinstein.
The quote from Levin supporting the idea that the Bombers
were not part of any organized, threatening group may be relevant but is not
clearly decisive.
On the other hand, it certainly is relevant to note that the elder brother actually was subject to an investigation some time ago and the FBI found no
special cause for concern.
But the methods and failures of the NYPD some time ago
perhaps are not.
No comments:
Post a Comment