The pseudonym "Philo Vaihinger" has been abandoned. All posts have been and are written by me, Joseph Auclair.

Wednesday, April 3, 2013

Scalia makes a valid point and Jen Sorensen doesn’t.



If justice means conformity to the constitution and honest interpretation thereof it is she who makes the mockery.

Scalia is on the money.

But if she refers to natural justice, moral justice, or divine justice, well, there are no such things.

Though in any case Scalia is right that the Supremes are not required to decide such matters, partisan folderol notwithstanding.

No comments:

Post a Comment