The Chris Lane shooting in Oklahoma

John Amato at C&L

Liberals pour out their anger against conservatives who, outrageously, have suggested the killing was racially motivated.

From the first day and even now, they denounced Zimmerman as a racist murderer, with no shred of evidence and though he had good reason for wonder about Trayvon Martin and even to shoot him.

For the liberals, Zimmerman was white, Martin was black, and that was enough.

But now?

Conservatives have actually cited evidence of their claim the murder of Lane was motivated by racism.

At least one of the three killers had expressed his hatred for whites on the web, somewhere.

Not good enough for John and friends, though.

No sirree.

Proof?

Liberals are now saying one of the three (a light skinned black?) is “clearly a white male.”

No kidding.

So, what’s their point, really?

Killer A is white so killer B, who is black, can’t have committed this crime out of racial hatred of white people?

Killer A is white so killer A, himself, cannot have been motivated by hatred of white people that he shared with his two black buddies?

That he could not have been that impossible thing, a white who was a black wannabe and thought this murder would be a great way to prove himself?

Codswallop.

But liberal fury is limitless at those dirty, rotten conservatives for even DARING to SUGGEST this was a black on white racial killing.