A better alternative to Hillary?
Per this article he is less an interventionist than Hillary.
The "but" is that he's not on board with the liberal hostility toward working class whites or their view that Democrats can and should win without them.
Is Hillary?
Is Pocahontas?
Is anybody, really, partially excepting O who is letting the racial chip on his shoulder overrule his better judgment on the matter?
On the other hand, all Democrats have to do to win their votes is be perceived as not as bad in net for the white working class as the Republicans.
And they still deserve to be thus perceived, though they are not, thanks to the racist lunacy of the propaganda and outlook of the liberals.
Reputedly, Webb's politics are more about class and his talk certainly is, and so far is he from being shy about how this makes him different that he emphasizes the difference.
No, he will not be the liberal darling.
But this won't be the only reason.
Others include that he is a white man and that he is too anti-interventionist for a liberal establishment that has never stopped wanting to save the world.
In contrast, Pocahontas is a white woman reputedly as interventionist as Hillary, and apparently as working-class friendly as Webb.
No comments:
Post a Comment