In politics, in academia, and in life in general, those who
talk think it’s about besting anybody else who talks.
But that’s not necessarily the way of things for those who
listen.
For those who talk it’s about who wins and who loses.
For those who listen it’s about who is talking sense, who is
right.
The gun rights propagandists think they have found a telling
point.
The office holders among the gun control advocates have bodyguards to a man, and
sometimes personally carry.
Their being armed leaves them feeling they need
and somehow lack a good riposte to the attacks of those who demand, counting on
the listeners to be at least as stupid as these demands, “Why are you better
than me? Why should your children be better protected than mine?”
Politicians may stumble, fearing the listeners really are
that stupid.
But it would be a mistake to rely too heavily on the
stupidity of those who listen.
Real or imagined.
In any event, no one is proposing the complete disarmament of all civilians.
The proposal on the table is a ban on assault rifles and on high capacity magazines to the general public.
We are by no means all equally in need of protection or self-protection with firearms.
In any event, no one is proposing the complete disarmament of all civilians.
The proposal on the table is a ban on assault rifles and on high capacity magazines to the general public.
We are by no means all equally in need of protection or self-protection with firearms.
No comments:
Post a Comment