Forgery? Only his supporters say that.

Roy Moore says signature is a forgery, experts say more evidence is needed either way

They're also screaming about "innocent until proven guilty," which applies to courts and not people.

Is there enough to show he's guilty beyond a reasonable doubt?

I hate relying on eyewitnesses, but there are a lot of accusations.

It's at least more likely than not that he's at least a philanderer and a specialist in overwhelming young girls with his status.

Actually, that's pretty much in the bag, for me.

But the sex crime against the 14 year old girl?

Yeah, that too, more likely guilty than not.

Beyond a reasonable doubt?

Maybe; maybe not.

Any one of these women could be an attention seeking liar.

But all of them?