She is, after all, an all-purpose conservative crank.
One Evangelical after
another told the Times that they no longer believe Americans should have control
over who immigrates here[.]
Really?
Did somebody actually say that?
Similarly, the
pro-choice crowd is brimming with compassion for girls who have gotten pregnant
by accident. They’re in high school, their whole lives are ahead of them, it’s
one mistake! The babies don’t count because they’re out of sight.
There is, after all, adoption.
Pro-lifers don’t say they have to actually raise the kid;
clearly that would not be best for anyone.
Only that they can’t kill it.
Interesting how many women instantly and instinctively
prefer to kill their children rather than let them live, raised by someone
else.
Abandonment guilt is more than they can take.
But not murder guilt.
Unfortunately for
educated Europeans desperate to escape their collapsing socialist societies
being overridden with Muslims, Mr. Crenshaw has not met them and therefore
cannot “personalize” their troubles. They’re
barred from coming here, and he’s fine with that.
What?
This new Christian ethic
of compassion-by-personal-encounter is also bad news for the millions of
American blue-collar workers unable to find work because of the massive influx
of unskilled immigrants.
And there will be no
compassion for the tens of millions of Americans who will never see a dime of
their promised Social Security payments, even as their taxes go through the
roof, because Mr. Crenshaw’s compassion requires that this country turn itself
into the welfare ward of the world.
An attack on immigration from
the left?
This is the same moral
courage that allows some of these ministers to rain fire and brimstone on gays,
while never getting around to criticizing divorce. They don’t know any gays —
but they have lots of divorcees in their pews.
She’s OK with the F&B rained down on gays but deplores a
lack of it raining down on the divorced?
No comments:
Post a Comment