The endless manufacture of grievance

Taking the Skins to Court

“Red skin” is not derogatory, though of course one can say it with a sneer.

One could say the same for "pale face" or "Chinaman."

And also for "Yankee," "English," or "German."

But the endless manufacture of offenses panders to liberal client groups and helps them train American whites, and especially males, to give up and accept a constant flow of blame.

And along with that blame come abuse, exploitation, denigration, punishment, arbitrary slapping around, and any number of bald-faced efforts to advantage those clients at the expense of the American majority.

Of course, it is derogatory to call someone a prick, and is meant to be.

But the use of that indelicate anatomical term is not in itself derogatory toward men, or in the least sexist - unless perhaps it is intended exactly that way when hurled as an epithet by an angry feminist!

What silly cunts they are, eh?

What nasty twats.

In contrast, consider the expression "sausage fest."

I think because it is so grossly anatomical it is far more offensive than "hen party."

And it is meant to be.

Is this why liberals, and perhaps especially the women among them like Hillary, instinctively side with Muslims rioting, killing people, and otherwise venting rage at what they consider offensive remarks about Islam?

Why they so instantly and without a qualm have fallen in with the PC creation of the novel offense, "Islamophobia"?

Hell hath no fury like a woman.

Or a Muslim.