The pseudonym "Philo Vaihinger" has been abandoned. All posts have been and are written by me, Joseph Auclair.

Tuesday, February 26, 2013

And who can blame them for dodging the issue?



The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.


What would the constitution say about this without the Fourth Amendment?

What does it say about this even with the Fourth Amendment?

See what I mean?

Way out on a limb, here, guys.

Where, by the way, is attorney-client privilege to be found in the constitution?

Just wondering.

No comments:

Post a Comment