With others, yes,
of course.
We are social animals, we humans - an inheritance, along with so much else, from our simian ancestry.
Few among us prefer to live apart, and the costs are high.
We are social animals, we humans - an inheritance, along with so much else, from our simian ancestry.
Few among us prefer to live apart, and the costs are high.
But in any case we do not live for
others.
To use one for the sake of others, or to insist that one
sacrifice for others, is taking advantage, sometimes very cruelly and often
selfishly, as when you and others push someone else into some sort of sacrifice for you
all.
"Greater love hath no man," eh? "Dulce et decorum est."
"Greater love hath no man," eh? "Dulce et decorum est."
Often, in fact, we use others unto death.
Nothing the least unusual about it.
In nearly all cases, those chosen by us or by circumstance to
be sacrificed do resist.
But not always.
We bully people into such things, or excuse our use of raw coercion, with talk of morals and the gods.
Sometimes people volunteer, too.
One thinks of the pig that wants to be eaten, that was bred to want to be eaten, a creation of Douglas Adams.
The political and religious relevance of these remarks is obvious.
We bully people into such things, or excuse our use of raw coercion, with talk of morals and the gods.
Sometimes people volunteer, too.
One thinks of the pig that wants to be eaten, that was bred to want to be eaten, a creation of Douglas Adams.
The political and religious relevance of these remarks is obvious.
No comments:
Post a Comment