But he hides or misses the key point.
As I commented at his post,
The
conservatives have killed the New Majority, if by that you mean the folks who
voted that year in that gigantic landslide for Nixon.
I was
among them, myself.
Nixon got
my vote in 1972 over McGovern because the latter was an incompetent tool of the
unnecessarily radical left of the Democratic Party of that time, while Nixon
was no conservative at all and was never thought by anyone to be incompetent -
until it all went to hell with the Watergate break-in.
Since
them, Democrats have been more competent and less lefty while the GOP has been
totally taken over by the kinds of right-wing extremists who hated Nixon when
he was in office and have lately been volubly denouncing him at conservative
outlets.
This whole
race thing is baloney, both when liberals pretend it's the core issue between
the parties and when conservatives do, each for reasons of ideological
self-interest.
The key to
it all is that the GOP has been taken over by fiscal conservatives IKE and
Nixon and all the moderate and liberal Republicans of their time would have
thought completely bonkers.
When the
conservatives give up their stranglehold on the party it will do a heck of a
lot better in elections, no matter what the skin color of the voters.
Hence the
liberals never point to this as the key problem for today's GOP.
The last
thing they want is a more effective GOP opposition.
And you
certainly didn't expect the conservatives to confess they are the GOP's
problem, did you?
If the Republican Party offered candidates who accepted
American social democracy and Big Government but differed from their Democratic
opponents in other ways that perhaps simply varied not so much by party as by
individual they would do a lot better, over time.
No comments:
Post a Comment