It's really the same reason they will never have done with their accusations of racism, sexism, and so on.
Denise Oliver Velez makes it pretty clear.
But what if we are not sorry since we have no cause to be?
We might regret and deplore the enslavement of Africans much
as we do slavery in the ancient world.
Or as little, come to that.
Or as little, come to that.
But there is no more reason for us or for our country, today, to apologize for the one than for the other, since we have and had as little to with the one as the other.
And no more reason to attempt or be required to make compensation or reparations.
Would Ms. Velez like to try to recover compensation or reparations from the descendants of those who profited by kidnapping and selling Africans into slavery in the New World, now living still in the lands of their ancestors?
Would Ms. Velez like to try to recover compensation or reparations from the descendants of those who profited by kidnapping and selling Africans into slavery in the New World, now living still in the lands of their ancestors?
The entire argument that current Americans in some distinctly morally unacceptable way have profited by slavery but nobody else has, possibly excepting the whites of the rest of the Americas, is just extortionate, resentful, racist baloney.
See the posts labeled "amoralism," especially the earlier ones.
The same objections and more apply to indigenista nonsense about the whites of the Americas and Oceania owing reparations based on the racist moral notions that these places were and even are the rightful possessions of "the indigenous peoples" as a whole, while all white arrivals and all of their descendants are and have always been guilty - in contrast to their wholly innocent "indigenous" victims - of wrongful invasion, conquest, and theft of these areas. as well as genocide and ethnic cleansing.
No comments:
Post a Comment