So, if it covered the attack in Pakistan would the so far
un-repealed authorization for the use of force cover an attack in Egypt?
Would such an attack be less necessary, less useful, or
otherwise less prudent?
For such an attack, does the president even require cover of
some sort of congressional authorization?
An “act of war” is not a war and does not constitute
starting one, though the other side may choose to respond with war.
No comments:
Post a Comment