Proving once again he is frank and astute, sometimes

The End of China?

Pat Buchanan asks,

What is it that gives a party its legitimacy, its right to rule? What holds a nation together when its cradle faith, its founding ideology, has been abandoned by both elites and the people? That is China’s coming crisis.

With victory in the civil war with the Nationalists in 1949, Mao claimed to have liberated China from both Japanese imperialists and Western colonialists, and restored her dignity. “China has stood up!” he said.

His party’s claim to absolute power was rooted in what it had done, and also what it must do. Only a party with total power could lead a world revolution. Only an all-powerful party could abolish inequality in a way that made the French Revolution look like a rebellion at Berkeley.

Xi Jinping’s problem? The Cold War is over. China is herself in the capitalist camp, a member of the G-8, and inequality in the People’s Republic resembles that of America in the Gilded Age.

How does the Chinese Communist Party justify control of all of China’s institutions today — economic, political, military and cultural?

Just so.

But maybe just the end of the regime, ultimately, and not of China, eh?

And his piece finishes very poorly with conservative boilerplate about nationalism, ethnicity, identity, and America.